Attorneys for the suspected Boston cop killer Karen Learn stated Monday that jurors in her trial over the loss of life of John O’Keefe had an “settlement” to seek out her no longer responsible prior to the pass judgement on declared a mistrial.Â
They raised the problem in a movement to disregard second-degree homicide fees and leaving the scene of an coincidence, in step with Boston 25, which printed the submitting.
3 of the 12 jurors despatched “unsolicited communications” to the protection, purportedly “indicating in no unsure phrases that the jury had a company 12-0 settlement that Ms. Learn was once no longer responsible of 2 of the 3 fees,” her attorneys wrote.
KAREN READ MURDER CASE ENDS WITH ‘DEEPLY DIVIDED’ JURY’S DECISION
The 44-year-old Learn’s trial ended after 5 days of deliberations remaining week when Pass judgement on Beverly Cannone declared a mistrial over what jurors described as their incapability to come back to a unanimous verdict, on the other hand.Â
SIGN UP TO GET TRUE CRIME NEWSLETTER
“In spite of our dedication, we’re deeply divided by way of basic variations,” jurors wrote in a observe to the pass judgement on. “No lack of awareness or effort. Consensus isn’t reachable.”
O’Keefe, Learn’s boyfriend on the time, died all through a storm from snow in January 2022 after Learn allegedly hit him together with her SUV and drove off, leaving him to die out of doors the house of every other officer.
WATCH: DASHCAM FROM THE NIGHT JOHN O’KEEFE WAS FOUND DEAD
GET REAL TIME UPDATES DIRECTLY ON THE TRUE CRIME HUBÂ
FOLLOW THE FOX TRUE CRIME TEAM ON X
A key battle between the protection and prosecution was once whether or not she hit him deliberately – and even knew she hit him in any respect.
Learn claimed that O’Keefe’s influential police colleagues set her up as the autumn individual.
Prosecutors, on the other hand, argued that the 2 had an alcohol-fueled argument at the evening of his loss of life.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
“In spite of our dedication to the obligation entrusted in us, we discover ourselves deeply divided by way of basic variations in our reviews and frame of mind,” the jury wrote in its ultimate observe to the pass judgement on remaining Monday.
Prosecutors have stated they plan to hunt a brand new trial. Learn’s attorneys countered with a constitutional double jeopardy argument, claiming that the jury had successfully rendered a no longer responsible verdict on a minimum of two fees.
Fox Information’ Stepheny Worth and Chris Eberhart contributed to this file.