After Harvard President Claudine Homosexual would now not say that the requires the genocide of Jews used to be a breach of the Ivy League college’s code of habits, the native campus Jewish group known as at the president to “take motion” to give protection to Jewish scholars.
When responding to Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-NY, questions about Harvard’s laws for bullying and harassment, President Homosexual stated that speech that qualifies as harassment “depends upon the context.”
The Jewish pupil group, Harvard Hillel, stated that President Homosexual’s “refusal” to “draw a line” on threatening antisemitic speech is “profoundly surprising.”
“President Homosexual’s refusal to attract a line round threatening antisemitic speech as a contravention of Harvard’s insurance policies is profoundly surprising given particular provisions inside the habits code prohibiting this type of bullying and harassment,” the Harvard Hillel stated in a commentary posted on social media.
STEFANIK GRILLS HARVARD PRESIDENT OVER STUDENTS CALLING FOR ‘INTIFADA,’ RAMPANT ANTISEMITISM ON CAMPUS
Dr. Claudine Homosexual, President of Harvard College, testifies prior to the Area Schooling and Group of workers Committee on the Rayburn Area Place of job Development on December 05, 2023 in Washington, DC. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Pictures)
The group stated that they’re appalled by way of the president’s loss of motion and wondered the president’s “talent to give protection to Jewish scholars on Harvard’s campus.”
“We’re appalled by way of the want to state the most obvious: A choice for genocide in opposition to Jews is at all times a hateful incitement of violence. President Homosexual’s failure to correctly condemn this speech calls into query her talent to give protection to Jewish scholars on Harvard’s campus,” the Harvard Hillel stated. “Chants to “globalize the intifada,” an endorsement of violent terrorist assaults in opposition to Jewish and Israeli civilians, and “from the river to the ocean,” an eliminationist slogan supposed to deprive Jews in their proper to self-determination in Israel, have turn out to be tragically regimen at Harvard.”
Supporters of Palestinians collect at Harvard College to turn their make stronger for Palestinians in Gaza at a rally in Cambridge, Massachusetts, on October 14, 2023. (Picture by way of JOSEPH PREZIOSO/AFP by means of Getty Pictures)
“President Homosexual’s testimony fails to reassure us that the College is critically involved in regards to the antisemitic rhetoric pervasive on campus. We name on President Homosexual to do so in opposition to the ones the usage of threatening speech that violates our neighborhood requirements,” the Harvard Hillel stated.
HARVARD, MIT AND UPENN PRESIDENTS PRESSED ON ‘RACE-BASED IDEOLOGY OF THE RADICAL LEFT’ AT ANTISEMITISM HEARING
Harvard Hillel President Jacob Miller stated that the president’s testimony used to be “completely disappointing,” and that tackling antisemitism will take “head-on unravel” now not “susceptible equivocation.”
HARVARD WHISTLEBLOWER POINTS TO ‘UNDISGUISED CALLS FOR THE MURDER OF JEWS’ AFTER LAUNCH OF FEDERAL PROBE
“President Homosexual’s testimony nowadays used to be shocking and completely disappointing,” Miller wrote in an X put up. “Tackling campus antisemitism will take head-on unravel, now not the susceptible equivocation that used to be on show nowadays.”
Lawmakers at the training committee will grill the leaders of Harvard College, the College of Pennsylvania and the Massachusetts Institute of Generation about their responses to protests that erupted after the October 7 assault on Israel by way of Hamas. (Haiyun Jiang/Bloomberg by means of Getty Pictures)
Homosexual, who testified in Congress on Tuesday, December 5 along MIT President Sally Kornbluth and College of Pennsylvania President Elizabeth Magill, in the past denounced Hamas’ terrorist assault in opposition to Israel on October 7.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Following complaint from pro-Palestinian pupil teams, Homosexual launched a video message two days later pronouncing that regardless that the college does now not “punish or sanction” other people for expressing polarizing perspectives, it does now not imply that it endorses them.
